🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to restart nuclear negotiations with the United States as long as it is handled with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's top diplomat has stated.

The Iranian diplomat said solely negotiations produced results, and shared recent overtures had come from go-betweens to restart negotiations with the American leadership. He said Iran possessed no unreported enrichment locations, and Iran could not yet permit the global atomic watchdog to access attacked atomic facilities for security reasons.

Walking a Difficult Path

Araghchi is navigating a challenging route since Iran wishes not to be seen to be acting from a position of vulnerability, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had emerged more resilient defensively and emotionally from the coordinated strike on its atomic facilities in June.

He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an absolute privilege to refine atomic fuel on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the primary cause of the deadlock in the previous talks.

Previous Negotiations Unexpectedly Concluded

The previous five rounds of talks between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and acrimonious termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, struck Iranian nuclear sites in a fortnight-long engagement that ended with Donald Trump asserting the locations had been eliminated. Subsequently, Western states exercised their right to reimpose international penalties, but Iran maintains they have not had a major impact.

Ideal Resolution Proposed

Iran's diplomats claimed they felt they had reached a "perfect agreement" to the enrichment issue in prior discussions, when it was agreed an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could refine atomic fuel. Both sides would have been able to declare success since home-based processing would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's enrichment initiative was entirely non-military.

It had not been agreed in the talks that American atomic experts could operate on Iranian soil, but that was a logical implication of the cooperative offer. Representatives stated three times they had reached agreement with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "spoilers in Washington".

Current Situation

Iranian officials stated the cooperative arrangement was now withdrawn, but it seems very probable the offer could be resurrected in certain ways if negotiations reopen.

Trump in recent days claimed he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but confidentially Tehran representatives state they are not yet obtaining coherent offers from the United States either directly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of non-responsiveness in the wake of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran asserts negotiations is not part of a performance.

Political Position

In his address to the conference, aimed to paint the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the notion of worldwide standards, Araghchi declared the two-week conflict demonstrated the clash could not be resolved by military means. He stated the strikes began with a American requirement for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an unconditional call for a ceasefire.

Iran is certain the initial Israeli attacks were carried out with complete American awareness and cooperation, making faith difficult to restore.

Dialogue Stays the Primary Answer

Araghchi declared: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted negotiations; it was America and the European states that had consistently tried to impose their demands during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be alive and continues the ultimate answer to resolve disagreements, but its requirements, regulations and fundamentals must be followed."

"Provided that they speak to the citizens of Tehran with the language of respect and respect, they will obtain a reply in the same language."

Repair and Rebuilding

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of repair and reconstruction, the foreign minister claimed he was confident Iran's defence capabilities "have significantly improved than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been restored. We learned numerous insights from this war; we have identified our own weaknesses and the vulnerabilities of the opponent."

He continued: "We effectively endured this engagement. Our enrichment knowledge, which they aimed to eliminate, remains in place. The installations and gear, if eliminated, will be restored; what is essential is the determination of the nation of Iran and then the national cohesion that they targeted, but failed to break. The nation of Iran have grown stronger, more integrated, and more backing of the administration and the nation in the aftermath of this invasion."